Monday, April 07, 2008

Racism and Basketball

One of the great things about sports is that it is pretty close to a true meritocracy. No one cares about anything except how well you perform, and there is an army of statisticians and guy with cameras on hand to record your every move. Sure, some guys get to rest on their reputations (Brett Favre, Derek Jeter), but despite the fact athletes are grossly overpaid, they can point to verifiable facts of what they contribute to a team’s success, and therefore their bottom line.

On the other hand, most sportswriting is downright awful. OK, that’s not entirely true, it just seems that way. But there is a vast array of code words which do nothing but hide the author’s true intent. “Professional” or “hard-working” usually means a white guy. “Scrappy” means a white guy who isn’t any good. “Athletic” means black. And I think it should be legal to punch anyone in the face who uses the lazy analogy of the 1980s Celtics-Lakers rivalry as a shorthand on race relations. Besides, it’s an analogy which doesn’t work for me, given that I rooted for the Sixers in the ‘80s because they had Dr. J.

I bring this up because Memphis is in the NCAA title game tonight and I couldn’t be happier about. Not because I care about Memphis, I really don’t. But we’ve been inundated by columns and talking heads talking about how Memphis is going to lose because they don’t play “fundamentals” and they rely on their “athleticism” and that they lack “fundamentals”. And it’s all a bunch of crap.

I challenge you to watch Derrick Rose play, and say he lacks fundamentals. And while only a moron would say he’s not athletic, looking at the way he can distribute the ball and his creativity in the air, he’s relying on more than just his athletic gift. He’s certainly hard-working. You don’t get that good without hour and hours of practice every day. It’s insulting to call him and his teammates merel;y “athletic” and they have made a mockery of the criticism in all of their press conferences. Coach John Calipari has pointed this out by claiming he’s just throwing them out there and letting them play and he’s not coaching at all. Which is a lie. Memphis is extraordinarily well-coached and they have a deep rotation of players. It’s insulting to everyone to call them simply athletic.

Hell, it’s insulting to their opponents as well. UCLA’s best player is Kevin Love, who has been described as hard-working and a “student of the game” despite his “limited athleticism”. Any guesses as to what color his skin is? Just as Rose is as hard-working and diligent as Love, Love is every bit as athletic as Rose. Sure, he doesn’t have the same aerial skills, but he’s dominant under the rim. Dorsey, Memphis’ big man, gave him the back-handed compliment that Love is a good passer, but Love IS a good passer and he also scores 20 points per game. That’s two things Dorsey can’t do (though Dorsey is ten times the defensive player Love is).

You’d think we’d be past this point. That we wouldn’t evaluate players and teams simply on melanin. But apparently not. So, I can’t wait for tonight’s game. And I’ll be rooting for Memphis to cut down the nets, if only to cast one small blow against narrow minded sportswriters (nothing against Kansas, a team I picked to win the tourney in my bracket pool – against Memphis). Just because they have tattoos and corn-rows, it doesn’t mean they can’t play fundamentals. And it doesn’t mean they can’t whip your ass.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh, Baker! There is no one making exagerated hand gestures in my living room or eating my candy or having pretentious discussions about books (or movies, or music) that I can't join in anymore! I miss you and Statton.

Katie said...

I miss you, too!

Anonymous said...

Seriously man, it's like the family is broken up.

Love,
Matt

Anonymous said...

Well, I'll have to disagree, at least as it relates to memphis. They have earned their reputation from their well documented run-ins with the law and behavior with the fans of other CUSA teams. Beyond that, the comments on fundamentals go to Memphis' offense, which is not based on any set plays and is instead little more than streetball. Coach Calipari also claimed that their free throw shooting (something where skill and hard work does translate and athleticism does not) does not matter and we saw that was wrong.

Also, it was ridiculous to claim that Kevin Love is every bit as athletic as Derrick Rose. Love is overweight and slow. The two are not comparable at all.

Poseur said...

Memphis doesn't play street ball. They actually run a lot of screens and play out of some organized sets. It is not simply five guys running around saying "I'm open!"

And the reason Calipari said free throws didn't matter is quite obvious: what the hell else is he gonna say? What you say to the media is not what you say in practice. Besides, Memphis hit free throws throughout most of the tourney. Of course, CDR missed the big ones at the end.

Love and Rose are not comparable players as one is a center and one is a point guard. What they do is completely different. But to think Kevin Love isn't athletic just because he doesn't jump out of the gym is to have a rather narrow definition of athleticism. Love is a dominant post player. He's not doing it on guile. The guy has serious talent.